A Brief History of Drug Testing

Drug testing is a big deal. At least fifteen large U.S. corporations supplying laboratory testing, employees and others are just a few minutes' drive from the testing facility. Employers who have a drug testing as a pre-employment screening tool for parents who want to keep tabs on the well-being of teenagers, many groups are often used for drug testing as a screening mechanism.

Since the 1980s, drug testing has become increasingly common. The group is likely to consider most prospective employees. The strict workplace safety legislation, and the fact that workers use dangerous equipment or access to sensitive information, employers want to be sure that the employees are not drug abusers. A sample of urine, hair, blood or swab from the mouth, the drug-testing laboratories are often the product is positive or negative results 24 48 hours.

Recently, drug abuse testing is increasingly widespread in professional athletics. The debates surrounding the use of steroids and other performance-enhancing drugs, athletes are very much under control. The government has also stepped in and started to stricter controls and more frequent screening of athletes. The result is a positive drug test could lead to penalties such as fines, loss of playing time or dismissal of the entire team. It's safe to say that the drug abuse-abusing athletes are taking huge risks in their careers, performance, or other illegal drugs.

Opponents of drug testing argue that it violates individual rights to privacy. They fear that even if the employee recreational drug user, this does not necessarily follow that his work will be affected. The random drug testing gaining popularity in the workforce, the people literally be drawn out of a hat as the next one in the drug screening. While states only loosely enforce drug-testing laws, opponents say that random drug testing can ruin a person's life. Even recreational weekend usage may cause the loss of employment if the drug is determined with a drug test. Random drug testing is often argued that testing without probable cause.


http://www.vibesconnect.com/stingmonk23
http://www.redcounty.com/stingmonk23
http://community.infragistics.com/members/stevehaps23/default.aspx
http://www.thepoint.com/users/stingmonk23/profile
http://www.clevelandfreepress.com/users/stevehaps23
http://www.heartagram.com/en-uk/users/stingmonk23
http://www.garagetv.com/stingmonk23
http://www.tntmagazine.com/members/stevehaps23/default.aspx
http://www.stupidvideos.com/profile/stevehaps23/
http://oceanup.com/users/stingmonk23
http://assetbuilder.com/members/stevehaps23/default.aspx
http://www.vibesconnect.com/stevehaps23
http://www.knittingdaily.com/members/stevehaps23/default.aspx
http://www.knittingdaily.com/members/stingmonk23/default.aspx
http://www.melodramatic.com/users/stingmonk23/
http://www.taslacrosse.org/?q=user/4890
http://www.heartagram.com/en-uk/users/stevehaps23
http://www.clevelandfreepress.com/users/stingmonk23
http://www.bellaboobabe.com/user/stingmonk23/uprofile
http://www.taslacrosse.org/?q=user/4891
http://socionics.org/members/stevehaps23.aspx
http://oceanup.com/users/stevehaps23
http://socionics.org/members/stingmonk23.aspx
http://snasm.com/users/stevehaps23
http://www.melodramatic.com/users/stevehaps23/
http://community.vh1.com/profile/01CAD31020231AD1C00010231AD1C/AboutMe.aspx
http://community.nationalbreastcancer.org/members/stevehaps23/default.aspx
http://unrealityshout.com/stevehaps23
http://www.tntmagazine.com/members/stingmonk23/default.aspx
http://www.autotop100.com/cs/members/stevehaps23.aspx